Take a wonder over to Linda Martins blog . She has shown that the bloody hands shown on one of the ‘participants’ in the cover up may well have been colour manipulated to create the appeareance of blood.
Linda says “I tried to replicate the process with a screen capture from the original film in the video. I lightened, saturated, and adjusted the ‘before’ image of the scene and couldn’t find any red on the man’s hands. I also noted that the red hand version in the YouTube video also featured blurred faces on two of the men in the picture – another clear indication that major photoshopping took place. The man looks tanned, not bloody. I hope nobody falls for this theory, which looks inaccurate to me – and that’s saying it nicely.”
Almost to the day of the great bigfoot Hoax fiasco of August 2008, comes another story which sadly is very real. Bigfoot researcher MK Davis had gained much respect with his stabilisation of the Patterson/Gimlin film. This can be found here.
However, he has been continuing his research upon the film and the word was that he had found something truly remarkable, something that had been overlooked by every other person who had studied the 40 year old footage. This ‘revelation’ would indeed shock many people and shake the bigfoot community to its core.
What is this much heralded revelation I here you say?
Well, apparently, Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin were involved in a massive cover up in which groups of men gunned down a “tribe” of Bigfoot late in October 1967. The famed October 20, 1967 Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot footage, according to Davis, is merely the deceptive end result of the killing fields.
His supporters also add that John Green, a true legend in the field of bigfoot research, was at the scene to clean up the body parts of the dead bigfoot. They back up their hypothesis with ‘photographic’ evidence.
This is highly slanderous to the likes of Bob Gimlin and John Green.